Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Parker v. Hutnak, et al
as 23-2006
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID PARKER
Defendant / Appellee:
KIMBERLY HUTNAK, NOELLE K. CLAPHAM, as a representative of the court, and as an individual, PHYLLIS HUTNAK, as an individual and others
In Re: Parker
as 23-2005
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID PARKER, acting as guardian on behalf of R.P.
Respondent / Appellee:
KIMBERLY HUTNAK, NOELLE K. CLAPHAM, as a representative of the court, and as an individual, PHYLLIS HUTNAK, as an individual and others
Marcus, et al v. American Contract Bridge League
as 22-1134
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PETER MARCUS, MATT KOLTNOW, DIANNE BARTON-PAINE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
AMERICAN CONTRACT BRIDGE LEAGUE, INC. and AMERICAN CONTRACT BRIDGE LEAGUE
Marcus, et al v. American Contract Bridge League
as 22-1135
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PETER MARCUS, MATT KOLTNOW and DIANNE BARTON-PAINE
Defendant / Appellant:
AMERICAN CONTRACT BRIDGE LEAGUE, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIC BELL, JENNIFER CARMICHAEL, SUSAN S.M. DOE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
AMERICAN CONTRACT BRIDGE LEAGUE
In Re: Zofran (Ondansetron) Products Liability Lit
as 21-1517
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HEATHER PERHAM, individually and on behalf of her minor child, X.M., THERESA MILLS, HUGH MILLS, III and others
Defendant / Appellee:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
Defendant:
SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD., SANDOZ, INC., PROVIDENCE HEALTH SYSTEM and others
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE, PUBLIC JUSTICE, P.C. and PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICA
Obi v. Exeter Health Res., Inc., et al
as 19-1512
Defendant / Appellee:
EXETER HEALTH RESOURCES, INC. and CORE PHYSICIAN LLC
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LORETTA AZUKA OBI
Defendant:
BARTON ASSOCIATES, INC.
Strahan v. Parham, et al
as 17-1628
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD MAX STRAHAN
Defendant - Appellee:
TYRONE PARHAM, DAVID SULLIVAN, DENISE BARTON and others
Jenkins, et al v. Gangi
as 16-1048
Plaintiff:
PPUC PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION, QUALITY SPEAKS, LLC, AMERICAN REGISTRY FOR INTERNET NUMBERS, LTD. and others
Interested Party - Appellee:
CARL F. JENKINS
Defendant - Appellant:
FRANK T. GANGI
Defendant - Appellee:
VERIZON NEW ENGLAND, INC., d/b/a Verizon Massachusetts
Defendant:
MA DEPT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS & ENERGY, PAUL B. VASINGTON, in his capacity as Commissioner, JAMES CONNELLY, in his capacity as Commissioner and others
Creditor:
PLYMOUTH PARK SERVICES, LLC, d/b/a Xspand, J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., Inc., GRANITE TAX, LLC, GSRAN-Z, LLC and others
Interested Party:
AIR MARYLAND, LLC, BABP, LLC, BROADVOICE, INC. and others
Movant:
PAULA M. COUTURE, in her capacity as Trustee of the 5 Regent Circle Realty Trust
Intervenor:
BARTON BRUCE
Global NAPs, Inc. v. Verizon New England, Inc.
as 15-1959
Plaintiff:
PPUC PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION, QUALITY SPEAKS, LLC, AMERICAN REGISTRY FOR INTERNET NUMBERS, LTD. and others
Interested Party - Appellee:
CARL F. JENKINS
Defendant:
MA DEPT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS & ENERGY, PAUL B. VASINGTON, in his capacity as Commissioner, JAMES CONNELLY, in his capacity as Commissioner and others
Interested Party - Appellant:
AMTRAK
Interested Party:
AIR MARYLAND, LLC, BABP, LLC, BROADVOICE, INC. and others
Movant:
PAULA M. COUTURE, in her capacity as Trustee of the 5 Regent Circle Realty Trust
Intervenor:
BARTON BRUCE
Global NAPs, Inc. v. Verizon New England, Inc.
as 15-1916
Plaintiff:
PPUC PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION, QUALITY SPEAKS, LLC, AMERICAN REGISTRY FOR INTERNET NUMBERS, LTD. and others
Interested Party - Appellee:
CARL F. JENKINS
Defendant:
MA DEPT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS & ENERGY, PAUL B. VASINGTON, in his capacity as Commissioner, JAMES CONNELLY, in his capacity as Commissioner and others
Interested Party - Appellant:
UNIVERSAL SERVICE ADMINISTRATIVE COMPANY
Interested Party:
AIR MARYLAND, LLC, BABP, LLC, BROADVOICE, INC. and others
Movant:
PAULA M. COUTURE, in her capacity as Trustee of the 5 Regent Circle Realty Trust
Intervenor:
BARTON BRUCE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
