Cases 1 - 10 of 275
Ford v. Ivey, et al
as 24-8031
Respondent:
MICHAEL J. DUNLEAVY, RONALD D. DESANTIS, BRIAN KEMP and others
Petitioner:
LARRY DONNELL FORD
Yahtues v. Kennedy, et al
as 24-1983
Defendant:
WELL-PATH, STEPHEN KENNEDY, Superintendent - Warden, Old Colony Correctional Center, JAMES M. O'GARA, JR., ADA Coordinator, Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
MALACHI I. YAHTUES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1923
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Pace v. Salamone, et al
as 24-1865
Defendant:
STEVEN KENNEWAY, Superintendent of The Souza Baranowski Correctional Facility, in their official and individual capacities, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, STEVEN SILVA, Former Superintendent of The Souza Baranowski Correctional Facility, in their official and individual capacities Defendant and others
Plaintiff:
ANDRE PACE
Gladu v. Magnusson, et al
as 24-1824
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS A. GLADU
Defendant:
RANDALL LIBERTY, in his individual and official capacities as Maine Department of Corrections Commissioner, MATTHEW MAGNUSSON, in his individual and official capacities as Maine State Prison Warden and JAMES HANCOX, in his individual and official capacities as Assistant to the Warden
Aaron v. Vicente
as 24-1793
Defendant:
NH STATE POLICE, MATTHEW PENROSE, RAFAEL RIVIERA, Lowell Police Officer and others
Plaintiff:
PAUL W. AARON
Balcacer v. Divris
as 24-1768
Petitioner:
JOSE F. BALCACER
Respondent:
MATTHEW DIVRIS, Superintendent, NCCI Gardner
Cronan v. Neronha, et al
as 24-1765
Defendant:
REP KAREN ALZATE, RI Legislator, REP SAMUEL A. AZZINARO, RI Legislator, REP ARTHUR J. CORVESE, RI Legislator and others
Plaintiff:
LAURIE CRONAN
Warren v. O'Malley
as 24-1558
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
KENNETH EARL WARREN, on behalf of Matthew L. Warren
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security
Zapata v. Divris
as 24-1521
Petitioner:
CARLOS RAMON ZAPATA
Respondent:
MATTHEW DIVRIS, Superintendent
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
