Cases 141 - 150 of 67,568
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv10755
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
St. John v. Campbell
as 1:2024cv10646
Petitioner:
Sandra Natasha St. John
Respondent:
Andrea Joy Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arbella Mutual Insurance Co. v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv10670
Plaintiff:
Arbella Mutual Insurance Co.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Nunez v. Santos
as 3:2024cv30064
Plaintiff:
Vincente Nunez
Defendant:
Edwin Santos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Rivera Ujaque v. Mikkola et al
as 3:2024cv30067
Plaintiff:
Osvalso Rivera Ujaque
Defendant:
John-Michael Mikkola, Micky Dumais and Chicopee, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Colon v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv30065
Plaintiff:
Angel Colon
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bannish v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv30066
Plaintiff:
Melissa Dawn Bannish
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Brown v. Commonwealth Care Alliance, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv11247
Plaintiff:
Donald L. Brown
Defendant:
Commonwealth Care Alliance, Inc., Dominique Moss and Rosemary Jackson
Coburn v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2024cv11244
Plaintiff:
Mark Coburn
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Massachusettes and Richard Belinsky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duffield v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv11242
Plaintiff:
Mark Duffield
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
