Cases 81 - 90 of 32,747
Rodrigues Da Silva v. Silveira Da Silva et al
as 1:2024cv11280
Plaintiff:
Edervaldo Rodrigues Da Silva
Defendant:
Jessica Silveira Da Silva and Gilberto Lucas
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Pavestone, LLC
as 1:2024cv11276
Plaintiff:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Defendant:
Pavestone, LLC
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319 Clean Water Act
Fowler and Sons, INC v. James A Fowler, III et al
as 1:2024cv11265
Plaintiff:
Fowler and Sons, INC; and The Fowler & Sons, INC. 401 (K)
Defendant:
James A Fowler, III, Charles W Fowler, Michael H Fowler and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Ardon Salvajan v. USCIS et al
as 1:2024cv11268
Plaintiff:
Wilfrido N Ardon Salvajan
Defendant:
U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES (USCIS), Asylum Office, USCIS, Director of USCIS Ur Mendoza Jaddou and others
Other:
United States
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
McAfee v. VA Hospital
as 1:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
Robert McAfee
Defendant:
VA Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Laccinole v. Sun Basket, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
Christopher Laccinole
Defendant:
Sun Basket, Inc. and Does 1 - 10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
In Re: Valentin Juarbe
as 24-8016
Respondent:
IRIS YOLANDA VALENTIN JUARBE
Interested Party:
TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE PUERTO RICO
Perry v. Lizotte
as 24-1491
Petitioner:
FREDERICK H. PERRY
Respondent:
KEN LIZOTTE, Superintended for MCI
Correa E Silva, et al v. Garland
as 24-1471
Petitioner:
RICARDO CORREA E SILVA, AMANDA FORTES DA SILVA CORREA, A. F. D. S. C. and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Single Path Solutions LLC v. DeliverHealth Solutions, LLC
as 1:2024cv11252
Plaintiff:
Single Path Solutions LLC
Defendant:
DeliverHealth Solutions, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
