Cases 51 - 60 of 87
Seams v. Massachusetts Department of Correction et al
as 1:2014cv13301
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Seams
Defendant:
Massachusetts Department of Correction, Raymond Marchilli, Phillip Kong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duna v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al
as 1:2013cv12033
Plaintiff:
Alex Duna
Defendant:
Immigration and Customs Enforcement , Plymouth County Sheriff's Department and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
ASSELIN v. JOHN DOES 1-3 et al
as 2:2013cv00320
Plaintiff:
SHAWN ASSELIN
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-3, JEFF CHUTE and JOHN LEBEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STILE v. SOMERSET COUNTY et al
as 1:2013cv00248
Plaintiff:
JAMES STILE
Defendant:
SOMERSET COUNTY, SOMERSET COUNTY SHERIFF, DAVID ALLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBERTS v. DOES 1 - 4 et al
as 2:2013cv00240
Plaintiff:
KEVIN ROBERTS
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1 - 4, JANE DOE, REGGIE LITTLEFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COTE et al v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY et al
as 2:2013cv00226
Plaintiff:
BRIAN COTE
Defendant:
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, CUMBERLAND COUNTY JAIL, KEVIN JOYCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malouf v. Devens F.M.C et al
as 1:2013cv10036
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Malouf
Defendant:
Devens F.M.C, Turner, Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Claudio v. Mendoza et al
as 1:2012cv11780
Plaintiff:
Jose Claudio
Defendant:
Claudio Mendoza, Duquette and John Doe 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sabree v. Mendosa et al
as 1:2012cv11742
Plaintiff:
G Saif Sabree
Defendant:
Anthony Mendosa, Christopher Hyde, Pamela O'Dell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Runyon v. Lee et al
as 1:2012fp00290
Defendant:
John Doe #1, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Plaintiff:
Fred Runyon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
