Cases 21 - 30 of 16,196
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01936
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Sharp v. City of Houston et al
as 4:2024cv02045
Plaintiff:
Shanice Sharp
Defendant:
City of Houston, Pamela French, Courts and others
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Perry v. Holmes
as 24-20224
Plaintiff:
Gerald Allen Perry
Defendant:
John B. Holmes, Harris County District Attorney's Office, Ken R. Williamson, Houston Police Department, Boyd Smith, Houston Police Department and others
Williams v. Newsom et al
as 3:2024cv00902
Plaintiff:
John W. Williams
Defendant:
Gavin Newsom, Jeffrey Macomber, Tammy Foss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. E Baton Rouge City Prsh
as 24-30318
Plaintiff:
Michael A. James, real party in interest Conner A. James
Defendant:
East Baton Rouge City Parish, Sid J. Gautreaux, III, Joshua Clark and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Cateran Inc. v. Red Smith Sales, Inc. dba Frank Supply Co. of Houston
as 4:2024cv01914
Plaintiff:
Cateran Inc.
Defendant:
Red Smith Sales, Inc. dba Frank Supply Co. of Houston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Hardy v. Silva et al
as 3:2024cv00899
Plaintiff:
Kristin Hardy
Defendant:
A. Silva and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HOUSTON v. MITCHELL et al
as 5:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY MANDELA HOUSTON
Defendant:
OFFICER MITCHELL and DEPUTY WARDEN LATORSHA JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01908
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
