Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Kampuries v. S.V.I. Investments et al
as 3:2023cv01177
Plaintiff:
Andrew J. Kampuries
Defendant:
S.V.I. Investments, Daniel W. Shelly and John Doe 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
SHERIFF et al v. GARDNER et al
as 2:2021cv00115
Plaintiff:
MIKE JOHANNES and ANDREW SHERIFF
Defendant:
MATTHEW GARDNER, KING REAL ESTATE and 440 MOUNT HOPE REALTY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Becker et al v. McDermott et al
as 3:2021cv01175
Defendant:
Michael McDermott and Mary Ann McDermott
Plaintiff:
Andrew Becker and Victoria Becker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Glascoff et al v. Laviano
as 1:2021cv00096
Plaintiff:
Andrew B. Glascoff, Timothy C. Glascoff and Matthew B. Glascoff
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Laviano
3Rd Party Defendant:
Susan Titus Glascoff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shotts v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 1:2020cv00224
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Andrew G Shotts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Aybar v. Harmon et al
as 1:2019cv00368
Defendant:
Specialized Loan Servicing, Harmon Law Offices, Andrew Harmon and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Ney Aybar
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Pare v. Harmony House, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv30097
Plaintiff:
Warren L. Pare
Defendant:
Harmony House, Inc., Cindy L. Pare, Maria Desmarais and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ford v. Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC
as 1:2017cv00286
Plaintiff:
Andrew E. Ford
Defendant:
Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
ROSENTHAL et al v. JC PENNEY CORPORATION INC
as 1:2017cv00104
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ROSENTHAL and ANDREW B ROSENTHAL
Defendant:
JC PENNEY CORPORATION INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mammola v. Feeney, et al
as 13-1801
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT J. MAMMOLA
Defendant - Appellee:
JOAN N. FEENEY, HAROLD B. MURPHY, LAW OFFICES OF MURPHY & KING and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
