Cases 121 - 130 of 10,201
Ruiz-Romero v. Department of State of Puerto Rico, et al
as 24-1334
Plaintiff:
ERNESTO RUIZ-ROMERO
Defendant:
STATE DEPARTMENT OF PUERTO RICO and PONTIFICAL CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICO
Parlon v. The United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2024cv10886
Plaintiff:
Joseph Patrick Parlon
Defendant:
The United States Department of Homeland Security, Alejandro Nicholas Mayorkas, Shoba Sivaprassad Wadhia and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Kelly v. O'Malley
as 24-1306
Plaintiff:
DANNY M. KELLY
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security and MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security
Cogley v. State of Rhode Island, et al
as 24-1309
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL COGLEY
Defendant:
STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, LINCOLN D. CHAFEE, Rhode Island Governor 2013-2015 in his official capacity, GINA M. RAIMONDO, Rhode Island Governor 2015-2021 in her official capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10867
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Northup v. Reilly et al
as 1:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Thomas Northup
Defendant:
William Reilly and Andrew Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Castro v. Romero-Lugo et al
as 3:2024cv01161
Plaintiff:
Ramon E. Castro
Defendant:
Miguel A. Romero-Lugo, Conjugal Partnership Romero-Doe, Vanessa Y. Jimenez-Cuevas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nunez v. Luciw et al
as 1:2024cv10848
Plaintiff:
Jorge Luis Nunez
Defendant:
Mikayla Marie Luciw, Megan Green and City of Boston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Driouech v. City of Northampton, Massachusetts et al
as 3:2024cv30047
Plaintiff:
Marisol Driouech
Defendant:
City of Northampton, Massachusetts, John Sellew and Jonathan Bartlett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
