Cases 51 - 60 of 722
Snell Jr. v. Zane et al
as 4:2023cv40074
Plaintiff:
Emory G Snell Jr.
Defendant:
William Zane, Richard Evans, Lisa Riccobene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Yates v. NH Hospital
as 1:2023fp00325
Plaintiff:
William Yates
Defendant:
NH Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Depina v. Cambell et al
as 1:2023cv00249
Plaintiff:
Laurinda Depina
Defendant:
Daniel E. Cambell, Brian Person, Anthony Troy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Booth v. Citizens Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2023cv00243
Plaintiff:
REV. WILLIAM BOOTH
Defendant:
Citizens Bank, N.A. and NABEEL BHATTI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
LIBBY et al v. SCHNEIDER et al
as 1:2023cv00221
Plaintiff:
LAUREL LIBBY, ALEXANDER TITCOMB, PAULA SUTTON and others
Defendant:
WILLIAM J SCHNEIDER, DAVID R HASTINGS, III, SARAH E LECLAIRE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Saykaly v. Donovan et al
as 1:2023cv00289
Plaintiff:
Nicholas E. Saykaly
Defendant:
Patrick E. Donovan, Esq. William J. Quinn and Amanda B. Colburn-Saykaly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mukulukusso v. Doogan et al
as 4:2023cv11096
Plaintiff:
Fernando Mukulukusso
Defendant:
William E. Doogan, Karim Elhamaway, Evan Maclean and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Mitchell v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, et al
as 23-1349
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CURTIS MITCHELL
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, WILLIAM H. KELLEY and PATRICK BROWNING
El Khoury v. Goulding, et al
as 23-1282
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IMAD G. EL KHOURY
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL GOULDING, Police Chief, EFTHIMIOS BOUSIOS, Sergeant, WILLIAM CARLO, Detective and others
Interested Party:
MA TRIAL COURT
Smith v. Roger Williams University School of Law
as 23-1285
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JIMMY SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
ROGER WILLIAMS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
