Cases 71 - 80 of 723
Douglas v. Suffolk County District Attorney et al
as 4:2023cv40019
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Jarome Hakim Douglas
Defendant:
Suffolk County District Attorney and William A. Hinton State Laboratory
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Zito v. Collins et al
as 1:2023cv10047
Plaintiff:
Thomas J. Zito
Defendant:
Sean K. Collins and William A. Gottlieb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown et al v. Emerling et al
as 1:2022cv12107
Plaintiff:
Rikkile Brown agent of d/b/a Political Petitioning of MA, Sean Murphy and Jeremiah Ulch
Defendant:
Kim Emerling, William H. Legault and Stephen A. Bohn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Strahan v. McNamara, et al
as 22-1930
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD MAXIMUS STRAHAN
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM F. MCNAMARA, TRACY BIRMINGHAM, STEVEN LEE and others
Negrn-Velzquez et al v. The Sherwin-Williams Company
as 3:2023cv01020
Plaintiff:
Jos Negrn-Velzquez and Lourdes Ferrer-Martnez
Defendant:
The Sherwin-Williams Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Negrn-Velzquez et al v. The Sherwin-Williams Company
as 3:2023cv01018
Plaintiff:
Jose Negrn-Velzquez and Lourdes Ferrer-Martnez
Defendant:
The Sherwin-Williams Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
SCHUSTER v. WILLIAMS
as 1:2022cv00359
Plaintiff:
JOHN SCHUSTER
Defendant:
DANNY WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
WICKHAM v. UNITED STATES
as 2:2023cv00002
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM J WICKHAM
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kemeh v. Silvestri et al
as 4:2022cv40023
Plaintiff:
Kevin Dela Kemeh
Defendant:
Jason Silvestri, Brian Fluery, Jacob Moisio and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Velasquez v. Smith
as 1:2022cv00448
Defendant:
Diego Velasquez and William E. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
