Cases 1 - 10 of 10,205
OLSZEWSKI et al v. HUTCHINS et al
as 1:2024cv00209
Plaintiff:
ROBERT OLSZEWSKI, JR and JULIE OLSZEWKSI
Defendant:
BARRY HUTCHINS and TOWN OF DOVER-FOXCROFT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Schlemmer et al v. Town of Moultonborough et al
as 1:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
John Schlemmer doing business as John's Towing Service, John's Towing Service, Inc. and John's Towing & Sons, Inc.
Defendant:
Town of Moultonborough and John Barlett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cullen v. Van Ness et al
as 1:2024cv11475
Plaintiff:
Brooke Cullen
Defendant:
Heather Van Ness, Emma Coakley, Richard Kelleher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
VARGAS-PEREZ et al
as 3:2024cv01256
Plaintiff:
NOEL VARGAS-PEREZ and HON. DENNIS RICHARD MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jones v. Providence Public Schools
as 24-1546
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA STEPHANIE JONES
Defendant:
PROVIDENCE PUBLIC SCHOOLS, Equal Employment Opportunity Officer
Cabacoff v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.
as 24-1531
Plaintiff:
ROBERT S. CABACOFF
Defendant:
FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC.
Wyman v. New Era Technology, Inc.
as 1:2024cv11450
Plaintiff:
Michael Wyman
Defendant:
New Era Technology, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
WHITTEMORE v. CIGNA HEALTH AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
JAMIE WHITTEMORE
Defendant:
CIGNA HEALTH AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Fantel, Jr. v. State of Rhode Island et al
as 1:2024cv00220
Plaintiff:
Clifford John Fantel, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Rhode Island and Town of South Kingston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Davis v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2024cv11441
Plaintiff:
Marcus Davis
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Ali Jaafar, Colonel Jack Mawn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
