Cases 1 - 10 of 10
GRAHAM v. RIVERVIEW PSYCHIATRIC CENTER
as 1:2022cv00234
Petitioner:
MARK GRAHAM
Respondent:
RIVERVIEW PSYCHIATRIC CENTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Graham v. State of Rhode Island
as 1:2020cv00393
Petitioner:
Roger Graham
Respondent:
State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GRAHAM v. STATE OF MAINE
as 2:2020cv00315
Respondent:
STATE OF MAINE
Petitioner:
MARK GRAHAM
Not Classified By Court:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - HABEAS CASES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Graham v. Gerry
as 13-1140
Petitioner - Appellant:
MELVIN C. GRAHAM
Respondent - Appellee:
RICHARD M. GERRY, Warden of NH State Prison
Graham v. NH State Prison, Warden
as 1:2012fp00271
Petitioner:
Melvin C. Graham
Notice Only:
NH Attorney General - Notice Only - HC (Court Use Only) and NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - HC (Court Use Only)
Respondent:
NH State Prison, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Graham, Jr. v. Grondolsky, et al
as 12-1361
Petitioner - Appellant:
EMMETT MADISON GRAHAM, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES, JEFFREY GRONDOLSKY, Warden, Fort Devens, HARLEY LAPPIN and others
Graham v. Grondolsky
as 10-2035
Petitioner - Appellant:
EMMETT MADISON GRAHAM, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
JEFF GRONDOLSKY, Warden, Fort Devens
Graham v. Grondolsky
as 4:2010cv40118
Petitioner:
Emmett Madison Graham, Jr.
Respondent:
J. Grondolsky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Graham v. Blaisdell
as 08-1490
Petitioner - Appellant:
MONTRIVILLE F. GRAHAM
Respondent - Appellee:
NORTHERN NH CORRECT and LARRY BLAISDELL
Graham v. Northern NH Correctional Facility, Warden
as 1:2007cv00008
Petitioner:
Montriville F. Graham
Respondent:
Northern NH Correctional Facility, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
