Cases 1 - 10 of 219
Schmitt v. Bowers
as 1:2023cv13203
Petitioner:
Thomas Schmitt
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden J. Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Teixeira v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv00431
Petitioner:
Fabrice Teixeira
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Mahoney v. US
as 23-1644
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRIAN E. MAHONEY
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
BARNARD v. UNITED STATES
as 1:2023cv00257
Petitioner:
JEFFREY PAUL BARNARD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Saez v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv11031
Plaintiff:
Juan Saez
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Acting Warden, Miami FCI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mahoney v. US
as 23-1011
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRIAN E. MAHONEY
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Diaz-Castro v. United States District Courts For the District of Puerto Rico
as 3:2022cv01497
Petitioner:
David Diaz-Castro
Respondent:
United States District Courts For the District of Puerto Rico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Velasquez v. Garland et al
as 1:2022cv11217
Petitioner:
Ariel Omar Velasquez
Respondent:
Merrick B Garland, United States Marshal Service and Daniel Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bailey v.Boncher
as 1:2022cv11082
Petitioner:
Miles Bailey
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden Amy Boncher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mahoney v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv10806
Petitioner:
Brian Edward Mahoney
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
