Cases 51 - 60 of 534
Pitt v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2022cv00156
Petitioner:
Luis Pitt
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Velasquez v. Garland et al
as 1:2022cv00149
Petitioner:
Ariel O. Velasquez
Respondent:
Merrick B Garland, United States Marshal Service and Warden Daniel Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Colson v. Suffolk County Boston
as 1:2022cv10357
Plaintiff:
Kennedy Dufield Colson, Jr
Defendant:
Suffolk County Boston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benner v. Alves et al
as 1:2021cv12080
Plaintiff:
Kevin Benner
Defendant:
Nelson Alves, Classification Disciplinary Board, DOC Legal Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sevegny v. Coyne-Fague
as 1:2021cv00471
Defendant:
Bryan Sevegny and Patricia Coyne-Fague
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diggs et al v Mici et al
as 4:2022cv40003
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Diggs, Demetrius Goshen, James Jacks and others
Defendant:
John Madden, James Gearin, Charles Primack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LeFever v. FCI Berlin
as 1:2021cv01080
Plaintiff:
Christopher LeFever
Defendant:
FCI Berlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Violette v. Fandryer et al
as 4:2021cv40050
Defendant:
Radm S. Spaulding, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Dr. Fandryer and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Paul Violette
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Samuel v. MacFarland
as 1:2021cv00353
Petitioner:
Jermane Merlyn Samuel
Respondent:
Patrick MacFarland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Abernathy et al v. Spectrum Health Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv11290
Plaintiff:
Franklin B. Abernathy, Curtis Holloway, Michael Jordan and others
Defendant:
Spectrum Health Systems, Inc., Larissa Dias, Jane Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
