Cases 1 - 10 of 19
HOOD v. MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2023cv00391
Plaintiff:
TODD HOOD
Defendant:
MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MARTIN MAGNUSSON, LARS OLSEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Velasquez v. Garland et al
as 1:2022cv00149
Petitioner:
Ariel O. Velasquez
Respondent:
Merrick B Garland, United States Marshal Service and Warden Daniel Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Martin v. DeMoura et al
as 1:2020cv11657
Defendant:
Charles Baker, Thomas J. Preston, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Sidney P Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. Koutoujian et al
as 1:2018cv12436
Defendant:
steven sinatra, Lieutenant Brian Crane, Telly Jack and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua A. Richardson
Not Classified By Court:
Edward F. Harrington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stile v. Somerset County, et al
as 16-2151
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES STILE
Defendant - Appellee:
HERRERA, Corrections Officer, PIKE, Corrections Officer, SOMERSET COUNTY and others
Defendant:
STATE OF MAINE, MAINE STATE BOARD OF CORRECTIONS, POULIN, Corrections Officer and others
Stile v. Somerset County, et al
as 16-1181
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES STILE
Defendant - Appellee:
HERRERA, Corrections Officer, PIKE, Corrections Officer, SOMERSET COUNTY and others
Stile v. Somerset County, et al
as 16-1180
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES STILE
Defendant - Appellee:
HERRERA, Corrections Officer, PIKE, Corrections Officer, SOMERSET COUNTY and others
Mendez v. Martin
as 1:2015cv00408
Petitioner:
Ariel Mendez
Respondent:
Daniel Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Smith v. US, et al
as 15-1265
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES, ROBERT EDWARD RICHARDSON, Assistant US Attorney, BOSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Melendez-Perez v. Mora
as 3:2014cv01328
Plaintiff:
Martin A. Melendez-Perez
Defendant:
Steve Mora
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
