Cases 1 - 10 of 143
CRANDALL v. KENNEBEC BEHAVIORAL HEALTH et al
as 1:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JOHN CRANDALL
Defendant:
KENNEBEC BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and PENOBSCOT COMMUNITY HEALTH AND COUNSELING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BOYLE v. YELLEN et al
as 2:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM BOYLE
Defendant:
JANET YELLEN, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and HIMAMAULI DAS
COCHRAN v. CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES LLC
as 1:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM N COCHRAN
Defendant:
CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
In re Lumico Life Insurance MOVEit Data Security Incident Litigation
as 1:2023cv12899
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Lacheryl Oneal, LaTonya Williams and Fannie Colay
Plaintiff:
Samuel Miller
Defendant:
Lumico Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
The Law Offices of William M. Gillen PC v. Ascend Finance Corporation
as 1:2023cv00456
Plaintiff:
The Law Offices of William M. Gillen PC
Defendant:
Ascend Finance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement
Teamsters Local 251 et al v. Williams
as 1:2023cv00124
Plaintiff:
Teamsters Local 251, Secretary Treasurer Matthew Taibi and President Paul Santos
Defendant:
Nick Williams
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Towne v. Gardner et al
as 1:2022cv00342
Plaintiff:
Brenda Towne
Defendant:
William Gardner, David Scanlan, Harri Hursti and others
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DICKEY
as 1:2022cv00254
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
WILLIAM C DICKEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of Debt to US
MORGAN v. CMG MORTGAGE INC
as 2:2022cv00232
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MORGAN doing business as CMG FINANCIAL and WILLIAM MORGAN
Defendant:
CMG MORTGAGE INC and CMG MORTGAGE INC doing business as CMG FINANCIAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
