Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Central Maine Power Company, et al v. ME Comm'n on Gov't Ethics and Election Practices, et al
as 24-1265
Plaintiff:
VERSANT POWER, ENMAX CORPORATION, MAINE PRESS ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant:
MAINE COMMISSION ON GOVERNMENTAL ETHICS AND ELECTION PRACTICES, WILLIAM J. SCHNEIDER, in his official capacity as Chairman of the Maine Commission on Governmental Ethics and Election Practices, DAVID R. HASTINGS, III, in his official capacity as a Member of the Maine Governmental Ethics and Election Practices and others
Interested Party:
PROTECT MAINE ELECTIONS, FREE SPEECH FOR PEOPLE and REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS
PRINGLE et al v. FREY et al
as 1:2023cv00453
Plaintiff:
JANE P PRINGLE, KENNETH FLETCHER, BONNIE S GOULD and others
Defendant:
AARON FREY, MAINE COMMISSION ON GOVERNMENTAL ETHICS AND ELECTION PRACTICES, WILLIAM J SCHNEIDER and others
Amicus Curiae:
PROTECT MAINE ELECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
CENTRAL MAINE POWER COMPANY v. MAINE COMMISSION ON GOVERNMENTAL ETHICS AND ELECTION PRACTICES et al
as 1:2023cv00450
Plaintiff:
CENTRAL MAINE POWER COMPANY
Defendant:
MAINE COMMISSION ON GOVERNMENTAL ETHICS AND ELECTION PRACTICES, WILLIAM J SCHNEIDER, DAVID R HASTINGS, III and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
VERSANT POWER, ENMAX CORPORATION, MAINE PRESS ASSOCIATION and others
Amicus Curiae:
PROTECT MAINE ELECTIONS
Petitioner:
FREE SPEECH FOR PEOPLE and REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
VERSANT POWER et al v. SCHNEIDER et al
as 1:2023cv00451
Plaintiff:
VERSANT POWER and ENMAX CORPORATION
Defendant:
WILLIAM J SCHNEIDER, DAVID R HASTINGS, III, SARAH E LECLAIRE and others
Petitioner:
PROTECT MAINE ELECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MAINE PRESS ASSOCIATION et al v. MAINE COMMISSION ON GOVERNMENTAL ETHICS AND ELECTION PRACTICES et al
as 1:2023cv00452
Plaintiff:
MAINE PRESS ASSOCIATION and MAINE ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS
Defendant:
MAINE COMMISSION ON GOVERNMENTAL ETHICS AND ELECTION PRACTICES, DAVID R HASTINGS, III, SARAH E LECLAIRE and others
Amicus Curiae:
PROTECT MAINE ELECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
CROSSPOINT CHURCH v. MAKIN et al
as 1:2023cv00146
Plaintiff:
CROSSPOINT CHURCH
Defendant:
A PENDER MAKIN, JEFFERSON ASHBY, EDWARD DAVID and others
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF MAINE and AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Packard v. Dunphy, et al
as 22-1078
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID A. PACKARD
Defendant / Appellee:
SEAN M. DUNPHY, former Chief Justice and his successors in office Massachusetts Probate and Family Court Department, JOHN D. CASEY, Chief Justice Massachusetts Probate and Family Court, PAMELA CASEY O'BRIEN, Register of Probate and her successors in office Massachusetts Probate and Family Court Department, Essex Division and others
Defendant:
WILL FULLER, President and CEO and his successor in office Transamerica Corporation and MARK PEARSON, President and CEO and his successor in office Equitable Holdings, Inc.
Packard v. Dunphy et al
as 1:2021cv11427
Plaintiff:
David A. Packard
Defendant:
Hon. Sean M. Dunphy, Hon. John D. Casey, Pamela A Casey O'Brien and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Marie Baptiste et al v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, et al
as 1:2020cv11335
Plaintiff:
Marie Baptiste, Mitchell Matorin and Jonathan Daponte
Defendant:
Executive Office of Housing and Economic Development, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, Gov. Charles Baker and others
Amicus Curiae:
Pacific Legal Foundation, UMass Memorial Health Care, Inc., MLPB (F/K/A Medical Legal Partnership / Boston) and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Chelsea Collaborative, Inc., Springfield No One Leaves, City Life/Vida Urbana and others
Petitioner:
Joseph Michalakes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
LawHQ, LLC et al v. Curtin
as 1:2020cv00033
Defendant:
David Curtin
Plaintiff:
LawHQ, LLC and Thomas Alvord
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
