Cases 1 - 10 of 22
H.R.M. Inc. v. The SEA AXIS, a 124-foot 1987 Heesen motor yacht (MMSI # 339603000), and its engines, tenders, bunkers, contents and appurtenances, etc. et al
as 1:2023cv00330
Plaintiff:
H.R.M. Inc.
Defendant:
The SEA AXIS, a 124-foot 1987 Heesen motor yacht (MMSI # 339603000), and its engines, tenders, bunkers, contents and appurtenances, etc. and 1328054 B C LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Belhaven Shipyard & Marina, Inc. v. VANISH, a 2021 Silent Yacht 60 motor yacht (Official # 1327819), and its motors, contents and appurtenances, etc. et al
as 1:2023cv11690
Plaintiff:
Belhaven Shipyard & Marina, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
National Maritime Services, Inc.
Defendant:
VANISH, a 2021 Silent Yacht 60 motor yacht (Official # 1327819), and its motors, contents and appurtenances, etc. and Vanish Marine Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Connecticut Marine Services, Inc. v. Kendrick, et al
as 1:2023cv00305
Plaintiff:
CONNECTICUT MARINE SERVICES, INC. d/b/a SEA TOW SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT and Connecticut Marine Services, Inc. doing business as Sea Tow Southern Connecticut
Defendant:
ROGER JOHN KENDRICK, in personam, OCEAN PEARL, a 2011 Oyster 625 Sailing Yacht, and its engine, bunkers, spars, sails, contents and appurtenances, etc., in rem, Roger John Kendrick and others
Counter Defendant:
Connecticut Marine Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Conanicut Marine Services, Inc. v. Shearer et al
as 1:2022cv00342
Not Classified By Court:
Conanicut Marine Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Douglas Shearer and NIMROS, a 1979 37 Alberg sailing yacht (bearing Sail # 15 and believed to bear Hull Identification # 3720579), its engine, furnishings, contents, appurtenances, etc., in rem
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
IYRS School of Technology & Trades v. CORONET, an 1885 133-foot sailing yacht (Official # 126346), its rigging, furnishings, contents, appurtenances, etc., in rem,
as 1:2022cv00211
Plaintiff:
IYRS School of Technology & Trades
Defendant:
CORONET, an 1885 133-foot sailing yacht (Official # 126346), its rigging, furnishings, contents, appurtenances, etc., in rem,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
SHM Sakonnet, LLC d/b/a Safe Harbor Sakonnet v. Sailing Yacht FARR 40 (Official # 1120807), its engines, spars, sails, generators, electronics, tackle, furnishings, contents, bunkers, appurtenances, etc.,
as 1:2021cv00317
Not Classified By Court:
SHM Sakonnet, LLC d/b/a Safe Harbor Sakonnet
Defendant:
Sailing Yacht FARR 40 (Official # 1120807), its engines, spars, sails, generators, electronics, tackle, furnishings, contents, bunkers, appurtenances, etc.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Scotiabank de Puerto Rico v. M/V Sea Trek 2, its engines, tackle, equipment, furnishings, etc. et al
as 3:2018cv01354
Plaintiff:
Scotiabank de Puerto Rico
Defendant:
M/V Sea Trek 2, its engines, tackle, equipment, furnishings, etc., Alfonso Piacentini-Olan, Idia L. Rivera-Padro and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Scotiabank de Puerto Rico v. M/V PATRIA, its engines, tackle, equipment, furnishings, etc. et al
as 3:2018cv01352
Plaintiff:
Scotiabank de Puerto Rico
Defendant:
M/V PATRIA, its engines, tackle, equipment, furnishings, etc., Luis Acevedo-Denis, Sandra Gonzalez-Aponte and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
HOWELL et al v. ADVANTAGE PAYROLL SERVICES INC et al
as 2:2016cv00438
Plaintiff:
JAMES HOWELL , CHASE MOZZICATO PATZ INC , PAYROLL ETC LTD and others
Defendant:
ADVANTAGE PAYROLL SERVICES INC and PAYCHEX INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ING Bank N.V. v. M/V EMERALD STRAIT, IMO No. 9488592, her engines, tackle, equipment, furniture, appurtenances, etc., in rem
as 1:2016cv10368
Plaintiff:
ING Bank N.V.
Defendant:
M/V EMERALD STRAIT, IMO No. 9488592, her engines, tackle, equipment, furniture, appurtenances, etc., in rem
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
