Other Statutes Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 61
Carson, et al v. Makin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-1746
Defendant / Appellee: PENDER MAKIN, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the Maine Department of Education
Interested Party: UNITED STATES, MAINE EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, PUBLIC FUNDS PUBLIC SCHOOLS and others
Defendant: ROBERT G. HASSON, JR., in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Maine Department of Education
Plaintiff / Appellant: DAVID CARSON, as parent and next friend of OC, ANGELA NELSON, as parent and next friend of AN and RN, TROY NELSON, as parent and next friend of AN and RN and others
Doe, et al v. Pawtucket School Department, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-1458
Defendant / Appellee: SHAUN W. STROBEL, in his capacity as Pawtucket City Treasurer, KAREN DUBE, in her individual and official capacity as a teacher and member of the Pawtucket Learning Academy, KERRI DAY, in her individual and official capacity as a teacher and member of the Pawtucket Learning Academy and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: MARY DOE, parent and next friend of Jane Doe, a minor and in her own right and JANE DOE, a minor in and for her own behalf and in her own right
Reale v. DCYF, et al
as 19-1265
Defendant / Appellee: HARRY LONERGAN, BETHANN MYERS, DIANNE LEYDEN and others
Defendant: CYNTHIA ROBERGE, SUSAN LYONS, COVENTRY, RI and others
Plaintiff: LEEANN CAGNINA, next friend of Jane Doe and BENJAMIN LIGERI, next friend of Jane Doe
Plaintiff / Appellant: DANIEL REALE, next friend of Janice Doe and John Doe
Peterson Puritan Site OU 2 Remedial Action Group v. A and J Tool & Findings Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00497
Defendant: EEM, Inc., McDonald's Corporation, American Textile and others
Plaintiff: Peterson Puritan Site OU 2 Remedial Action Group and Peterson - Puritan Site OU 2 Remedial Action Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901
Friends of Ruth & Emily, Inc. v. City of New Bedford We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv11809
Plaintiff: Friends of Ruth & Emily, Inc.
Defendant: City of New Bedford
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538
Friends of Animals, et al v. Phifer, et al
as 17-1389
Plaintiff - Appellant: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, WILDLIFE ALLIANCE OF MAINE, ANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTE and others
Defendant - Appellee: PAUL PHIFER, in his official capacity as Assistant Regional Director of Ecological Services for the Northeast Regional Office of the United States Fish Wildlife Service, JIM KURTH, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, US FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE and others
Roy, et al v. Canadian Pacific Railway Co.
as 17-1108
Defendant: DAKOTA MINNESOTA AND EASTERN RAILROAD CORPORATION, d/b/a Canadian Pacific Railway and SOO LINE RAILROAD COMPANY, d/b/a Canadian Pacific Railway
Plaintiff: JACQUES GRENIER, VARIETE CLAUDE CHARRON INC, PATRICK RODRIGUE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: GUYLAINE ST-LAURENT, as representative of the Estate of Natachat Gaudreau, deceased, DENISE DUBOIS, LUC LAFONTAINE and others
Defendant / Appellee: CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY
Premium Sports, Inc. v. Lamas et al
as 1:2015cv00236
Plaintiff: Premium Sports, Inc.
Defendant: Maria Lamas and Good Friends, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0553
FRIENDS OF ANIMALS v. PHIFER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00157
Plaintiff: FRIENDS OF ANIMALS
Defendant: PAUL PHIFER and DAN ASHE
Intervenor_defendant: STATE OF MAINE , US SPORTSMEN'S ALLIANCE FOUNDATION , MAINE TRAPPERS ASSOCIATION and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Friends of Animals v. Phifer et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv30011
Plaintiff: Friends of Animals
Defendant: Paul Phifer and Dan Ashe
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?