Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Constr. Industry and Laborers Joint Pension Trust v. Carbonite, Inc., et al
as 20-2110
Defendant / Appellee:
ANTHONY FOLGER, MOHAMAD S. ALI and CARBONITE, INC.
Defendant:
LINDA CONNLY, MARINA LEVINSON, CHARLES F. KANE and others
Interested Party:
CAMELOT EVENT DRIVEN FUND, A Series of Frank Funds Trust, TOM JOHNATAN OR-PAZ, PETER WU and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY AND LABORERS JOINT PENSION TRUST
Plaintiff:
VALERIE COSGROVE, RUBEN A. LUNA, individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, WILLIAM FENG, individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated and others
Pure Encapsulations LLC v. Sunshine Marigolds, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv10575
Defendant:
Charles Chang- Hua Feng, John Does 1-100, individually or as corporate/ business entities and Sunshine Marigolds, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Pure Encapsulations LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Dahua Technology USA, Inc. v. Zhang
as 20-1338
Defendant / Appellee:
FENG ZHANG
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAHUA TECHNOLOGY USA, INC.
Dahua Technology USA, Inc. v. Zhang
as 20-1107
Defendant / Appellant:
FENG ZHANG
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DAHUA TECHNOLOGY USA, INC.
Feng v. Carbonite, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv11808
Defendant:
Carbonite, Inc., Anthony Folger and Mohamad S. Ali
Plaintiff:
William Feng
Petitioner:
Peoria Police Pension Fund
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
In re: App of George W. Sclich
as 17-1377
Petitioner - Appellant:
GEORGE W. SCHLICH
Respondent - Appellee:
THE BROAD INSTITUTE, INC., FENG ZHANG, NAOMI HABIB and others
In re Application of GEORGE W. SCHLICH for Order to take Discovery Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782,
as 1:2016mc91278
Petitioner:
George W. Schlich
Respondent:
The Broad Institute, Inc. , Feng Zhang , Naomi Habib and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Wang v. Holder
as 14-1845
Petitioner:
REI FENG WANG
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
