Cases 1 - 10 of 36
US v. Scamaroni-Cintron
as 23-1152
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
MARTIN SCAMARONI-CINTRON
Interested Party:
U.S. SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, OHIO DEPARTMENT OF JOB AND FAMILY SERVICES, MAINE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and others
Medical Mutual of Ohio v. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
as 1:2022cv10302
Plaintiff:
Medical Mutual of Ohio
Defendant:
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Washington Trust Company v. Caramadre et al
as 1:2021cv00274
Defendant:
Joseph A. Caramadre, United States, Paula M. Caramadre and others
Plaintiff:
Washington Trust Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
FAMILY PLANNING ASSOCIATION OF MAINE et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 1:2019cv00100
Defendant:
DIANE FOLEY, MD, OFFICE OF POPULATION AFFAIRS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Plaintiff:
J DOE, DO, MPH, FAMILY PLANNING ASSOCIATION OF MAINE and SUSAN B ANTHONY LIST
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS, SOCIETY FOR MATERNAL-FETAL MEDICINE, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Continental Casualty Company et al v. Caramadre et al
as 1:2018cv00461
Defendant:
Joseph A. Caramadre, John W. Mitchell, Transamerica Life Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Continental Casualty Company and Navigators Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lex Claims, LLC, et al v. Ruiz-Rivera
as 17-1337
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LEX CLAIMS, LLC, JACANA HOLDINGS, LLC, JACANA HOLDINGS II, LLC and others
Defendant / Appellee:
FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, ALEJANDRO J. GARCIA PADILLA, JUAN C. ZARAGOZA-GOMEZ and others
Defendant:
AMBAC ASSURANCE CORPORATION, DECAGON HOLDINGS 1, LLC, PUERTO RICO AAA PORTFOLIO BOND FUND II, INC. and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANGEL RUIZ RIVERA
Interested Party:
FINANCIAL GUARANTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Lex Claims, LLC, et al v. Ruiz-Rivera
as 17-1337
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LEX CLAIMS, LLC, JACANA HOLDINGS, LLC, JACANA HOLDINGS II, LLC and others
Defendant:
AMBAC ASSURANCE CORPORATION, FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD, ALEJANDRO GARCIA PADILLA and others
Movant - Appellant:
ANGEL RUIZ-RIVERA
Interested Party:
FINANCIAL GUARANTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Lex Claims, LLC, et al v. Ambac Assurance Corporation
as 17-1272
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LEX CLAIMS, LLC, JACANA HOLDINGS, LLC, JACANA HOLDINGS II, LLC and others
Defendant - Appellant:
AMBAC ASSURANCE CORPORATION
Defendant:
FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD, ALEJANDRO GARCIA PADILLA, JUAN C. ZARAGOZA-GOMEZ and others
Movant:
JOSE F. RODRIGUEZ, DECAGON HOLDINGS 4, LLC, DECAGON HOLDINGS 10, LLC and others
Interested Party:
GOLDEN TREE ASSET MANAGEMENT LP, MERCED CAPITAL, LP, OLD BELLOWS PARTNERS LLP and others
Intervenor:
FIRST PUERTO RICO TAX-EXEMPT FUND, INC.
Lex Claims, LLC, et al v. Alejandro Garcia Padilla, et al
as 17-1248
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LEX CLAIMS, LLC, JACANA HOLDINGS, LLC, JACANA HOLDINGS II, LLC and others
Intervenor - Appellant:
SCOGGIN MANAGEMENT LLP, JOSE F. RODRIGUEZ, DECAGON HOLDINGS 2, LLC and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ALEJANDRO GARCIA PADILLA, JUAN C. ZARAGOZA-GOMEZ, LUIS G. CRUZ-BATISTA and others
Intervenor:
FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD, AMBAC ASSURANCE CORPORATION, PUERTO RICO AAA PORTFOLIO BOND FUND II, INC. and others
Lex Claims, LLC, et al v. Alejandro Garcia Padilla, et al
as 17-1241
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LEX CLAIMS, LLC, JACANA HOLDINGS, LLC, JACANA HOLDINGS II, LLC and others
Defendant - Appellant:
FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO GARCIA PADILLA, JUAN C. ZARAGOZA-GOMEZ, LUIS G. CRUZ-BATISTA and others
Intervenor:
GOLDEN TREE ASSET MANAGEMENT LP, MERCED CAPITAL, LP, OLD BELLOWS PARTNERS LLP and others
Interested Party:
JOSE F. RODRIGUEZ, DECAGON HOLDINGS 4, LLC, DECAGON HOLDINGS 3, LLC and others
Movant:
FINANCIAL GUARANTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
