Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Arbogast v. Pfizer, Inc., et al
as 23-1591
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRENT ANDREW BRACKETT ARBOGAST
Defendant / Appellee:
PFIZER, INC., SHEEHAN, PHINNEY, BASS & GREEN PA, JOHN J. BRACK and others
Arbogast v. Pfizer, Inc., et al
as 23-1481
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRENT ARBOGAST and BRENT ANDREW BRACKETT ARBOGAST
Defendant / Appellee:
PFIZER, INC., SHEEHAN, PHINNEY, BASS & GREEN PA, JOHN J. BRACK and others
Arbogast v. Pfizer et al
as 1:2022cv10156
Plaintiff:
Brent A. Arbogast and Pro se Litigant Brent A. Arbogast
Defendant:
Pfizer, Sheehan, Phinney, Bass & Green, P.A., John J. Brack and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Comvaltech Corp., et al v. Liquid Capital Exchange, Inc.
as 20-1016
3Rd Party Defendant:
PFIZER PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., WYETH WHITEHALL PHARMACEUTICALS, PFIZER PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC and others
Defendant / Appellant:
EDWIN ANTONIO ALGARIN MOURE, President of Comvaltech and COMVALTECH CORP.
Defendant:
HECTOR R. FIGUEROA-FERNANDEZ
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, as receiver of RG Premier Bank of Puerto Rico
Comvaltech Corp., et al v. Liquid Capital Exchange, Inc.
as 19-1870
3Rd Party Defendant:
PFIZER PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., WYETH WHITEHALL PHARMACEUTICALS and PFIZER PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC
Defendant / Appellant:
EDWIN ANTONIO ALGARIN MOURE, President of Camvaltech and COMVALTECH CORP.
Defendant:
HECTOR R. FIGUEROA-FERNANDEZ
Interested Party:
LIQUID CAPITAL EXCHANGE, INC.
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, as receiver of RG Premier Bank of Puerto Rico
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) v. Comvaltech Corp. et al
as 3:2019cv01440
Defendant:
Comvaltech Corp., Hector R. Figueroa-Fernandez and Edwin A. Algarin-Moure
3Rd Party Defendant:
Wyeth Whitehall Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer Pharmaceutic, Inc. and Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, LLC
Intervenor:
LiquidCapital Exchange, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US, et al v. Pfizer, Inc.
as 16-1805
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES, ex rel. ALEX BOOKER and EDMUND HEBRON, ALEX BOOKER, ex rel. UNITED STATES, STATES OF CA, CO, CT, DE, FL, GA, HI, IL, IN, LA, MD, MA, MI, MN, MT, NH, NJ, NM, NY, NC, OK, RI, TN, TX, VA and WI, and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and EDMUND HEBRON, ex rel. UNITED STATES, STATES OF CA, CO, CT, DE, FL, GA, HI, IL, IN, LA, MD, MA, MI, MN, MT, NH, NJ, NM, NY, NC, OK, RI, TN, TX, VA and WI, and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Defendant - Appellee:
PFIZER, INC.
Painters and Allied Trades v. Forest Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al
as 16-8024
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES DISTRICT COUNCIL 82 HEATH CARE FUND
Plaintiff:
MARTHA PALUMBO, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated (09-11532), PETER PALUMBO, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated (09-11532), JAYNE EHRLICH, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated (09-11532) and others
Defendant - Respondent:
FOREST LABORATORIES, INC. and FOREST PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Defendant:
WARNER-LAMBERT CO. and PFIZER, INC.
Interested Party:
NATALIE LUSTER
Ligeri v. Monsanto Company et al
as 1:2015cv00177
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Ligeri
Defendant:
Monsanto Company, E.I. du Ponte de Nemours and Company, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
FDIC, as Receiver of RG Premie v. Algarin Moure, et al
as 15-1517
Plaintiff - Appellee:
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, as Receiver of RG Premier Bank of Puerto Rico
Defendant - Appellant:
EDWIN ANTONIO ALGARIN MOURE, President of Comvaltech Corp. and COMVALTECH CORP.
Defendant:
SCOTIABANK DE PUERTO RICO
Third Party Defendant:
WYETH PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., WYETH WHITEHALL PHARMACEUTICALS, PFIZER PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Third Party Defendant - Appellee:
BANCO POPULAR DE PUERTO RICO
Interested Party:
RG PREMIERE BANK OF PUERTO RICO, FDIC Receiver and LIQUID CAPITAL EXCHANGE, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
