Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Family Planning Ass'n of Maine, et al v. US Dep't of Health & Hum Svcs, et al
as 20-1781
Defendant / Appellee:
ALEX MICHAEL AZAR, II, in his official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services, DIANE FOLEY, MD, in her official capacity as Deputy Assistant Secretary for Population Affairs, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Interested Party:
MEMBERS OF CONGRESS, AMERICAN COLLEGE OF OBSTETRICIANS AND GYNECOLOGISTS, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FAMILY PLANNING ASSOCIATION OF MAINE, on behalf of itself, its staff, and its patients, doing business as MAINE FAMILY PLANNING and J DOE, DO, MPH, individually and on behalf of Dr. Doe's patients
Plaintiff:
SUSAN B ANTHONY LIST
Family Planning Ass'n of Maine, et al v. US Dep't of Health & Hum Svcs, et al
as 19-1836
Defendant / Appellee:
ALEX MICHAEL AZAR, II, in his official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services, DIANE FOLEY, MD, in her official capacity as Deputy Assistant Secretary for Population Affairs, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Interested Party:
MEMBERS OF CONGRESS, AMERICAN COLLEGE OF OBSTETRICIANS AND GYNECOLOGISTS, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
J DOE, DO, MPH, individually and on behalf of Dr. Doe's patients, FAMILY PLANNING ASSOCIATION OF MAINE, on behalf of itself, its staff, and its patients doing business as MAINE FAMILY PLANNING and FAMILY PLANNING ASSOCIATION OF MAINE, on behalf of itself, its staff, and its patients, doing business as MAINE FAMILY PLANNING
Plaintiff:
SUSAN B ANTHONY LIST
FAMILY PLANNING ASSOCIATION OF MAINE et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 1:2019cv00100
Defendant:
DIANE FOLEY, MD, OFFICE OF POPULATION AFFAIRS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Plaintiff:
J DOE, DO, MPH, FAMILY PLANNING ASSOCIATION OF MAINE and SUSAN B ANTHONY LIST
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS, SOCIETY FOR MATERNAL-FETAL MEDICINE, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Gould, et al v. Morgan, et al
as 17-2202
Amicus Curiae:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, STATE OF DELAWARE, ERWIN CHEMERINSKY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
COMMONWEALTH SECOND AMENDMENT, INC., CHRISTOPHER HART, SARAH ZESCH and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DANIEL C. O'LEARY, in his Official Capacity as Chief of the Brookline Police Department, WILLIAM G. GROSS, in his Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Boston Police Department, MARK MORGAN, Acting Chief of the Brookline Police Department and others
Petitioner:
ALAN B. MORRISON and JACK RAKOVE
Plaintiff:
IRWIN CRUZ and MARKUS VALLASTER
Defendant:
DAVID A. PROVENCHER, in his Official Capacity as Chief of the New Bedford Police Department
Jerry L. Conway, D.C. et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Anthem, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv02002
Plaintiff:
Jerry L. Conway, D.C. , Corey Musselman, M.D. , The San Antonio Orthopaedic Group, L.L.P. and others
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Anthem, Inc., Health Care Service Corporation, Cambia Health Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv11754
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv11655
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rada v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv11676
Defendant:
Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Trans Union, LLC, Equifax Information Services, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Carolee Rada
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv12194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
