Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Gillis, et al. v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, et al.
as 1:2022cv11733
Plaintiff:
Robert J Gillis
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, as Successor by Merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., Alfa Laval Inc., Ametek, Inc., individually and as successor to Schutte & Koerting and others
Cross Defendant:
Blackmer, BNS Co., Carrier Corporation and others
Cross Claimant:
Crosby Valve, LLC, General Electric Company, Harvard University and others
Interested Party:
Industry Products Company
Not Classified By Court:
Judge Donald L Cabell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Crosby v. Plaza Internacional Puerto Rico LLC. et al
as 3:2022cv01043
Plaintiff:
Richard Crosby
Defendant:
Plaza Internacional Puerto Rico LLC., Taubman Centers Inc and Simon Property Group Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Crosby-Korzeniowski et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2021cv11721
Plaintiff:
Dawn Crosby-Korzeniowski and Alison Crosby-Korzeniowski
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Knox et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation as successor by merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv11695
Plaintiff:
Thomas Knox, Rosemarie Knox and Bayer Cropscience Inc., Successor in interest to Amchem Products, Inc.
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation as successor by merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., Alliance Laundry Systems LLC Individually and as successor-in-interest to American Laundry Machinery Co., Armstrong International, Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
Columbia Boiler Company, Crane Co., Crosby Valve, LLC and others
Cross Claimant:
General Electric Company
Interested Party:
Defendants Liaison Counsel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Cook et al v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv11362
Plaintiff:
Roland Cook and Linda Cook
Defendant:
Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation, A.W. Chesterton Company, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation as successor by merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
Cleaver-Brooks, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mark Chamberlain et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv10964
Defendant:
Viking Pump, Inc., Asco Valve, SB Decking, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Chamberlain and Judith Chamberlain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Crosby v. Divi Hotels Marketing, Inc.
as 1:2020cv10918
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Crosby
Defendant:
Divi Hotels Marketing, Inc.
Michael Twombly v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv10236
Defendant:
Aurora Pump, Ford Motor Company, VAPOR POWER INTERNATIONAL and others
Cross Defendant:
Crosby Valve, LLC, Crane Co., York International Corporation and others
Cross Claimant:
General Electric Company, COPES VULCAN, INC., The Budd Company and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL TWOMBLY, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF WILBUR TWOMBLY and Michael Twombly
3Rd Party Defendant:
Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority
Not Classified By Court:
Robert B. Collings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Lee v. Cleaver-Brooks, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv11284
Defendant:
Viking Pump, Inc., HBW Industries, Inc. f/k/a The Hodge Boiler Works, Spirax Sarco, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Barbara F Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Drummond et al v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
as 1:2016cv11614
Plaintiff:
Theodore G. Drummond and Patricia Drummond
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company , Clifton Associates, Inc., Eckel Industries Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
Roth Pump Company , Metropolitan Life Insurance Company , General Electric Company and others
Cross_defendant:
API Heat Transfer Inc. a/k/a API Heat Transfer Electric Heater Company, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation as successor by merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc. , Alfa Laval, Inc. individually and as successor to The DeLaval Separator Co. and Sharples, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
