Cases 11 - 20 of 357
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Parker v. Hutnak, et al
as 23-2006
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID PARKER
Defendant / Appellee:
KIMBERLY HUTNAK, NOELLE K. CLAPHAM, as a representative of the court, and as an individual, PHYLLIS HUTNAK, as an individual and others
In Re: Parker
as 23-2005
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID PARKER, acting as guardian on behalf of R.P.
Respondent / Appellee:
KIMBERLY HUTNAK, NOELLE K. CLAPHAM, as a representative of the court, and as an individual, PHYLLIS HUTNAK, as an individual and others
Traudt v. Lebanon Police Department, City of Lebanon et al
as 1:2023cv00500
Plaintiff:
Scott Traudt
Defendant:
Lebanon Police Department, City of Lebanon, Phillip Roberts, Richard Smolenski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Trump, et al
as 23-1783
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT W. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
DONALD J. TRUMP, FACEBOOK, INC., META and others
FARRINGTON v. FAIRFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2023cv00362
Plaintiff:
ROBERT FARRINGTON
Defendant:
FAIRFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT, THOMAS GOULD, DAKOTA WILLHOITE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Howard v. Bisenius et al
as 1:2023cv12176
Plaintiff:
David Howard
Defendant:
Theresa A Bisenius, Jennifer M Ulwick, Mary Rudolph Black and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Bristol Police Department, et al.
as 1:2023cv00391
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Smith
Defendant:
Bristol Police Department and Police Officer Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Parker v. Hutnak, et al.
as 1:2023cv00378
Plaintiff:
David Parker
Defendant:
Noelle Clapham, Kimberly Hutnak, Phyllis Hutnak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
