Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Blum, et al v. Holder
as 13-1490
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SARAHJANE BLUM, RYAN SHAPIRO, LANA LEHR and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
Movant:
BAYSTATE MEDICAL CENTER, INC.
Interested Party:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH, ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGES, ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN UNIVERSITIES and others
Defendant:
P. MICHAEL CONN
Isaacs v. Leominster, City of et al
as 4:2012cv40137
Plaintiff:
Grant J. Isaacs
Defendant:
Leominster, City of , George H. Beauvais , Michael J. Kochanski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
G., et al v. Town of Alton, et al
as 1:2011cv00571
Defendant:
Alton, Town of, Edward Correia, Tyler Hackett and others
Plaintiff:
Alexander G. and Robert G.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Allen v. Sojourner House et al
as 1:2011cv00266
Plaintiff:
Karen Allen
Defendant:
Sojourner House, Patricia Hessler, Gianna Boulet and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv40118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00476
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv11691
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00285
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 11702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv10199
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00570
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
