Cases 31 - 40 of 680
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01523
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00414
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00376
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Educational Amendments
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv11935
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
GERBER v. WARD et al
as 1:2023cv00319
Plaintiff:
LENA GERBER
Defendant:
ISAAC WARD, AROOSTOOK COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT, JEFFERY PICKERING ESQ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gino v. President and Fellows of Harvard College et al
as 1:2023cv11775
Plaintiff:
Francesca Gino
Defendant:
Harvard University, The Harvard Corporation, Srikant Datar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
BARTH v. WATERBORO et al
as 2:2023cv00295
Defendant:
MARILYN MILLER, TOWN OF WATERBORO, GARY LAMB and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN S BARTH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MacDonald v. Brighton Police Chief, et al
as 23-1595
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KINLEY MACDONALD
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIGHTON POLICE CHIEF, BRIGHTON POLICE OFFICERS, 1-25 John Does, BRIGHTON SUPERVISING OFFICER, John Does and others
MacDonald v. Brighton Police Chief, et al
as 23-1596
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KINLEY MACDONALD
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIGHTON POLICE CHIEF, BRIGHTON POLICE OFFICERS, 1-25 John Does, BRIGHTON SUPERVISING OFFICER, John Does and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00337
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
