Cases 31 - 40 of 20,880
Abdelrasoul v. Trustees of Boston University
as 24-1468
Plaintiff:
ISLAM FAISAL M.I. ABDELRASOUL
Defendant:
TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Melendez-Velez et al v. Pagan-Cardona et al
as 3:2024cv01221
Plaintiff:
Jose Melendez-Velez, Johanna Delgado-Rodriguez, JJMD and others
Defendant:
Jose Pagan-Cardona, Anibal Centeno-Rosario and Cristina Cruz-Villegas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Acosta v. Providence Police Department
as 1:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
Robert Acosta, Jr.
Defendant:
Providence Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1458
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Galdos-Shapiro v. The Town of Great Barrington et al
as 3:2024cv30070
Plaintiff:
Arantzazu Zuzene Galdos-Shapiro
Defendant:
The Town of Great Barrington, The Berkshire Hills Regional School District, Paul E. Storti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Doe v. MGH Institute of Health Professions
as 1:2024cv11290
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
MGH Institute of Health Professions
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11285
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Vicente v. Kingkade et al
as 1:2024cv11270
Plaintiff:
Jesuino T Vicente
Defendant:
Kenneth w Kingkade and Edward Varteresian
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
