Cases 71 - 80 of 113
Baldi v. United States et al
as 1:2013cv11282
Plaintiff:
John A. Baldi
Defendant:
United States, Deval Patrick, Tim Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. Chelsea, City of et al
as 1:2013cv10792
Plaintiff:
Wayne Clark
Defendant:
Chelsea, City of , Chelsea Police Department, The , David K. Betz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00130
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00129
Defendant - Defaulted:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Melville v. Adams, Town of et al
as 3:2013cv30051
Plaintiff:
Paula Melville
Defendant:
Adams, Town of, Jonathan Butler, Erica Samson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Atkinson v. Town of Rockport, et al
as 12-2405
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES M. ATKINSON
Defendant / Appellee:
ROCKPORT, MA, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, SALEM STATE COLLEGE and others
Atkinson v. Town of Rockport, et al
as 12-2405
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES M. ATKINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MA ROCKPORT, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, SALEM STATE COLLEGE and others
Gillis v. Clark et al
as 1:2012cv12043
Plaintiff:
George W. Gillis
Defendant:
Brian Clark and Robert Kimball
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Giorgio et al v. Clarke et al
as 1:2012cv11171
Plaintiff:
Matthew Giorgio and Colin Traver
Defendant:
Harold W Clarke, Louis Spencer, Peter St. Amand and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Atkinson v. Town of Rockport, et al
as 12-1523
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES M. ATKINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MA ROCKPORT, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, SALEM STATE COLLEGE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
