Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Avanru Development Group, Inc. v. Swanzey, NH, Town of et al
as 1:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Avanru Development Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Swanzey, NH, Town of, Ann Karasinski, Adam Mulhearn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
May v. May et al
as 4:2023cv40099
Plaintiff:
Yarnell May
Defendant:
Brenda May and Laya Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Dos Reis v. Officer Lara #129 et al
as 1:2023cv00322
Plaintiff:
Micael Duarte Dos Reis
Defendant:
Officer Lara #129, Officer Lane #109, Officer Leroux #424 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00317
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv10340
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv11963
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Mendes, et al v. Lane
as 22-1605
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JAZMIN MENDES, SABINE TEMPLIER, EVELYN FARRINGTON and others
Defendant / Appellant:
LUANITA LANE
Lane v. Mendes, et al
as 22-1562
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LUANITA LANE
Defendant / Appellee:
JAZMIN MENDES, Social Worker, Department of Children and Families, SABINE TEMPLIER, Social Worker, Department of Children and Families, EVELYN FARRINGTON, Supervisor, Department of Children and Families and others
Lane v. McCarthy et al
as 1:2022cv11145
Plaintiff:
Luanita Lane
Defendant:
James McCarthy, Frantz Dumond and Nicholas Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Lane v. McCarthy et al
as 1:2022cv11144
Plaintiff:
Luanita Lane
Defendant:
John McCarthy, Frantz Dumond and Nicholas Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
