Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1983
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00343
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00337
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1071 Higher Education Act 1965
Pierce v. Concord Police Dept et al
as 1:2022cv00147
Plaintiff:
Rosemary D. Pierce
Defendant:
Concord Police Dept and Salem Ma. Police Dept
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Pierce v. Riverbend Mental Health
as 1:2021cv00404
Defendant:
Riverbend Mental Health
Plaintiff:
Rosemary D. Pierce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Alves et al v. McNamara et al
as 1:2020cv11933
Plaintiff:
Brandon Alves, Nathan Pierce and Nicholas Bernat
Defendant:
Branville Bard, Donna McNamara and Richard Fuller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Common Cause Rhode Island et al v. Gorbea et al
as 1:2020cv00318
Plaintiff:
Barbara Monahan, League of Women Voters of Rhode Island, Miranda Oakley and others
Defendant:
Rhode Island Republican Party, Nellie M. Gorbea, Diane C. Mederos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goldin et al v. Restrepo et al
as 1:2020cv00262
Defendant:
Janice Pucci, Diane C. Mederos, Edward Murphy and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathon Acosta, Jeanine Calkin, Gayle Goldin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Gaspee Project et al v. Mederos et al
as 1:2019cv00609
Plaintiff:
Illinois Opportunity Project and The Gaspee Project
Defendant:
Stephen P. Erickson, Diane C. Mederos, David H. Sholes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
