Cases 1 - 10 of 180
Olszta v. Town of Brimfield et al
as 3:2024cv12281
Plaintiff:
Ryan Olszta
Defendant:
Chief William J. Beaudry, Harold Leaming, Michael Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Olszta v. Town of Brimfield et al
as 1:2024cv12281
Defendant:
Michael Miller, Suzanne Collins, Town of Brimfield and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan Olszta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Mlynick v. Town of Erving et al
as 3:2024cv30108
Plaintiff:
John Mlynick
Defendant:
Town of Erving, Tucker Jenkins, Adam Paicos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01384
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Cantrell v. Brunswick Maine Police, et al
as 24-1522
Defendant:
ZACHARY HUBER, PATRICK SCOTT, CORY ILES and others
Plaintiff:
BRICE CANTRELL
Doe, et al v. City of Boston, et al
as 24-1419
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE, JANE DOE and JAMES DOE
Defendant:
BOSTON, MA, PAUL EVANS, individually, ROBERT DUNFORD, individually and others
D.S. v. Smith et al
as 1:2024cv11615
Plaintiff:
Jane Smith and D. S.
Defendant:
SEEM Collaborative District, Does 1-6, Adam McCusker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Brum v. Town of Bristol et al
as 1:2024cv00169
Plaintiff:
Michael Brum
Defendant:
Town of Bristol, Bristol Police Department, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1458
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Avanru Development Group, Inc. v. Swanzey, NH, Town of et al
as 1:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Avanru Development Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Swanzey, NH, Town of, Ann Karasinski, Adam Mulhearn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
