Cases 1 - 10 of 517
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1310
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1477
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01209
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10544
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
United States of America v. Vazquez et al
as 3:2024cv01160
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Carlos Vazquez and Ligia Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Lockley v. Cotto-Davila et al
as 3:2023cv01562
Plaintiff:
Tamieka Lashawn Lockley
Defendant:
Orlando Cotto-Davila, Ileana Cruz-Velazquez, Juan Carlos Vera-Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
de-la-Fuente-Diaz et al v. Pierluisi et al
as 3:2023cv01544
Plaintiff:
Inaru Nadia de la Fuente Diaz, Maru Rosa Hernandez, Andre Rodil and others
Defendant:
Pedro Pierluisi, Carlos R Mellado Lopez, Wanda Llovet Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ryan v. DeMaria, et al
as 22-1513
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES P. RYAN
Defendant / Appellee:
CARLO DEMARIA, JR., Mayor, City of Everett, JAMIE RUSSO, then-Director of Constituent Services, DEBRA J. BRETON, Past Attorney/Mortgage Broker and others
Defendant:
ROBERT GREENE, Suffolk County Assistant District Attorney
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00215
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
