Cases 1 - 10 of 53
BURNHAM v. MORGAN et al
as 1:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
DILLIAN BURNHAM
Defendant:
ANDREW MORGAN, ETHAN WHITNEY, FRANKLIN DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Watson v. Hodge et al
as 1:2023cv12909
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Donald Watson
Defendant:
Jascha Franklin Hodge, Boston Transportation Dept. and City Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Rounds v. U.S. Department of Justice, et al
as 23-1789
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IRVING FRANKLIN ROUNDS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, RICHARD CIRUOLO, Agent, Department of Justice and JOHN COUGHLIN, Agent, Department of Justice
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00337
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00224
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Marshall v. Sununu et al
as 1:2023fp00228
Plaintiff:
Krystal Marshall
Defendant:
Christopher Sununu, Judd Gregg, Pembroke Academy High School and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Schmitt v. Franklin County House of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv30012
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Schmitt
Defendant:
Franklin County House of Corrections and Northwestern District Attorneys office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv30143
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1071 Higher Education Act 1965
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00432
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
