Cases 1 - 10 of 24
A Woman's Concern, Inc. v. Healey et al
as 1:2024cv12131
Defendant:
Rebecca Hart Holder, Commissioner of DPH Robert Goldstein, Reproductive Equity Now, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
A Woman's Concern, Inc. doing business as Your Options Medical
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Amesbury v. Manning et al
as 1:2024cv00257
Defendant:
William Sisson, Jeffery Johnson, Barbara Pacheco and others
Plaintiff:
Brian P. Amesbury
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11525
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11524
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11285
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1491
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1261
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amesbury v. Burnes, et al
as 23-1077
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK E. AMESBURY, d/b/a Polytechnic
Defendant / Appellee:
HANNAH BURNES, RI State Fire Marshal, Investigator, DAVID GOLDSTEIN, Chief Fire Marshal, DONALD R. GREBIEN, Mayor and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1515
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amesbury v. Burnes et al
as 1:2022cv00255
Plaintiff:
Mark E. Amesbury d/b/a Polytecnic
Defendant:
Hannah Burnes, David Goldstein, Donald Grebien and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
