Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Cronan v. Nerhona et al
as 1:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
Laurie Cronan
Defendant:
Peter Nerhona, Daniel Ballirano, Kerry Travers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bowman et al v Monteiro et al
as 1:2024cv10850
Plaintiff:
Leo Bowman and Zirahuen Bowman
Defendant:
Sgt Agnaldo P Monteiro, Officer William Hull, Officer Brenden Wheeler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Beaudoin v. Baker, et al
as 23-1989
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN PAUL BEAUDOIN, JR. and JOHN PAUL BEAUDOIN, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLES DUANE BAKER, JR., MAURA TRACY HEALEY, in her official capacity as Governor of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, MARGARET R. COOKE, individually and in her official capacity as Commissioner of the Department of Public Health of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and others
Beaudoin, Sr. v. Baker et al
as 1:2022cv11356
Plaintiff:
John Paul Beaudoin, Sr.
Defendant:
Charles D. Baker, Margaret R. Cooke, Mindy Hull and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Devine v. Town of Hull, Massachusetts et al
as 1:2021cv11230
Plaintiff:
Michael Devine
Defendant:
Town of Hull, Massachusetts, Town of Hull School Committee, David Twombly and others
Not Classified By Court:
Judge Robert B. Collings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
MacLeod v. Town of Hull et al
as 1:2021cv10046
Defendant:
Lou Sorgi, Sean Bannen, Town of Hull and others
Plaintiff:
Marjorie MacLeod
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Nelson v. Hull et al
as 1:2020cv11576
Defendant:
Gary DePalma, Jeffrey M. Hull, John (Al) Spaulding and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saunders v. Town of Hull
as 17-1174
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SCOTT SAUNDERS
Defendant - Appellee:
HULL, MA
Defendant:
RICHARD K. BILLINGS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
