Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Humphrey v. California Highway Patrol
as 1:2024cv10575
Plaintiff:
Thomas Edward Humphrey
Defendant:
California Highway Patrol
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Humphrey v. Douglas Prosecuting Attorney
as 1:2024cv10331
Plaintiff:
Thomas Edward Humphrey
Defendant:
Douglas Prosecuting Attorney
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv40138
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00106
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
CHASE v. SAUFLEY et al
as 2:2017cv00427
Plaintiff:
DANIEL L CHASE
Defendant:
LEIGH I SAUFLEY, DONALD G ALEXANDER, ANDREW M MEAD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Humphrey et al v. Comoletti et al
as 1:2015cv14170
Plaintiff:
Fred Humphrey , Taneisha Humphrey and J.B.
Defendant:
Jeffrey Comoletti, William Falandys, John Cabral and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Humphrey v. Town of Spencer et al
as 4:2014cv40127
Plaintiff:
John W Humphrey
Defendant:
Town of Spencer, Todd Laporte, Paul Magierowski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Mass. College of Pharmacy, et al
as 14-1568
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY D. WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
MASSACHUSETTS COLLEGE OF PHARMACY AND ALLIED HEALTH SCIENCES, JACKSON LEWIS LLP, SCOTT L. MASSEY and others
Defendant:
L&E GLOBAL and STEPHAN SWINKELS
GOING v. LAPREL et al
as 2:2014cv00031
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS J GOING
Defendant:
ALAYNA LAPREL , NEAL SMITH , JENS BERGENS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GOING v. LAPREL et al
as 2:2014cv00031
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS J GOING
Defendant:
ALAYNA LAPREL, NEAL SMITH, JENS BERGENS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
