Cases 1 - 10 of 2,544
Singleterry v. Shaheen & Gordon Law Firm et al
as 1:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
Daryl Singleterry
Defendant:
Shaheen & Gordon Law Firm, Amy Driscoll, Driscoll Law Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Kenney v. Rhode Island Cannabis Control Commission and Kimberly Ahearn, in her Official Capacity
as 1:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
John Kenney
Defendant:
Rhode Island Cannabis Control Commission and Kimberly Ahearn, in her Official Capacity
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00251
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Ross v. Woodcock, et al
as 24-1587
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LEE ROSS
Defendant:
HONORABLE JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR., BRYCE TURGENSON, Probation Officer, 2 UNKNOWN PROBATION OFFICERS and others
Weinberg v. Mangal et al
as 1:2024cv11606
Plaintiff:
Robert Paul Weinberg
Defendant:
Nagina Mangal, Ann Graybiel, Sally Kornbluth and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00220
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11588
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11587
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01266
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01262
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
