Cases 1 - 10 of 64
Ptak et al v. Van-Patten-Steiger et al
as 1:2023cv11423
Plaintiff:
Viviane Ptak and Viviane Ptak as Personal Representative of the Estate of Philip Paul Castonguay, III
Defendant:
Jeanne Van-Patten-Steiger, Joseph Francesconi, Elias Giokas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Ptak et al v. Van Patten-Steiger et al
as 4:2023cv11423
Plaintiff:
Viviane Ptak
Defendant:
Jeanne Van Patten-Steiger, Joseph Francesconi, Elias Giokas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Clervrain et al v. Hunter et al
as 1:2022fp00123
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain and Wesner Compere
Defendant:
Paul Hunter, Alysa D. Erichs, David Michael McConnell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv10482
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Karas v. Medway Police Department
as 1:2017cv11101
Plaintiff:
Paula J Karas
Defendant:
Medway Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Karas v. Medway Police Department
as 4:2017cv11101
Plaintiff:
Paula J Karas
Defendant:
Medway Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Feldman v. Woodlock, et al
as 15-1127
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEBRA FELDMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
DOUGLAS P. WOODLOCK, NEWS CORPORATION, TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX and others
Karas v. Milford Regional Medical Cente
as 15-1073
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAULA J. KARAS
Defendant - Appellee:
MILFORD REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER RISK MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
Feldman v. Woodlock et al
as 1:2014cv12279
Plaintiff:
Debra Feldman
Defendant:
Douglas P. Woodlock, News Corporation, Twentieth Century Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Karas v. Martin, MD
as 1:2013cv00646
Plaintiff:
Paula J. Karas
Defendant:
Dr. Jonathan Martin, MD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
