Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Carbonell et al v. Lopez Figueroa et al
as 3:2022cv01236
Plaintiff:
Vanessa E. Carbonell, Roberto A. Whatts Osorio, Elba Y. Colon Nery and others
Defendant:
Antonio Lopez Figueroa, Alexis Torres Rios and Union of Organized Civilian Employees
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McNeil v. Williams et al
as 1:2021cv00261
Defendant:
Kendra Neri, Scott Sweet, Brian Williams and others
Plaintiff:
James R. McNeil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 21-1332
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01770
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Neris-Vega v. Oriental Bank & Trust et al
as 3:2011cv01867
Plaintiff:
Mayra Neris-Vega
Defendant:
Oriental Bank & Trust and Sylvia Rivera-Schatz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv02265
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Araujo, et al v. Providence, RI, et al
as 08-2417
Plaintiff:
SONDRA BUOTE, EILEEN CALCAGNI, MADELAINE DEROBBIO and others
Plaintiff - Appellee/Cross-Appellant:
JAMIE ARAUJO, ANDREA BAKER, MICHELLE A. BARRETT and others
Defendant:
JOSEPH RICHARDSON, individually and in his official capacity as the former Deputy Director of the Communications Department, VINCENT A. CIANCI, JR., individually and in his official capacity as the former Mayor for the City of Providence and URBANO PRIGNANO, JR., individually and in his official capacity as the former Chief of Police for the City of Providence
Defendant - Appellant/Cross-Appellee:
PROVDIDENCE, RI, by and through its treasurer, Steven T. Napolitano, DAVID N. CICILLINE, in his official capacity as Mayor and Acting Public Safety Commissioner for the City of Providence, COLONEL DEAN ESSERMAN, in his official capacity as the Chief of Police for the City of Providence and others
:
and
Walden, et al v. Lennon, et al
as 08-1536
Plaintiff:
SONDRA BUOTE, EILEEN CALCAGNI, MADELAINE DEROBBIO and others
Plaintiff - Appellee/Cross-Appellant:
JAMIE ARAUJO, ANDREA BAKER, MICHELLE A. BARRETT and others
Defendant:
VINCENT A. CIANCI, JR., individually and in his former official capacity as the former Mayor for the City of Providence, JOSEPH RICHARDSON, individually and in his former official capacity as the former Deputy Director of the Communications Department, JOHN C. CHMURA and others
Defendant - Appellant/Cross-Appellee:
PROVDIDENCE, RI, by and through its Treasurer, Steven T. Naplitano, DAVID N. CICILLINE, in his official capacity as Mayor and Acting Public Safety Commissioner for the City of Providence, COLONEL DEAN ESSERMAN, in his official capacity as the Chief of Police for the City of Providence and others
:
and
Walden, et al v. Providence, RI by and through, et al
as 08-1535
Plaintiff:
SONDRA BUOTE, EILEEN CALCAGNI, MADELAINE DEROBBIO and others
Plaintiff - Appellee/Cross-Appellant:
JAMIE ARAUJO, ANDREA BAKER, MICHELLE A. BARRETT and others
Defendant:
VINCENT A. CIANCI, JR., individually and in his former official capacity as the former Mayor for the City of Providence, JOSEPH RICHARDSON, individually and in his former official capacity as the former Deputy Director of the Communications Department, JOHN C. CHMURA and others
Defendant - Appellant/Cross-Appellee:
PROVDIDENCE, RI, DAVID N. CICILLINE, in his official capacity as Mayor and Acting Public Safety Commissioner for the City of Providence, COLONEL DEAN ESSERMAN, in his official capacity as the Chief of Police for the City of Providence and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
