Cases 1 - 10 of 11
North End Chamber of Commerce, Inc. et al v. City of Boston
as 1:2024cv10039
Plaintiff:
North End Chamber of Commerce, Inc., 119 Salem St., Inc. doing business as Ristorante Euno, Antico Forno, Inc. doing business as Antico Forno and others
Defendant:
City of Boston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alexandre v. Prince et al
as 1:2022cv11340
Plaintiff:
Jovany Alexandre
Defendant:
Jane D Prince and William G Farrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv11419
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1218
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00646
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Josephs v. Offutt, et al
as 15-2237
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SOPHIA JOSEPHS
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID OFFUTT, CLAUDE JOSEPH, KEITH HAWKINS and others
Prince v. City of Providence et al
as 1:2015cv00378
Plaintiff:
John Prince, Jr.
Defendant:
City of Providence, Roger Aspinal, Francisco Guerra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Josephs v. Offutt et al
as 1:2015cv10038
Plaintiff:
Sophia Josephs
Defendant:
David Offutt, Claude Joseph, Keith Hawkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00469
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Melo v. Prince Street Realty Trust et al
as 1:2013cv11120
Plaintiff:
Andres Ramon Melo
Defendant:
Prince Street Realty Trust, Carolyn Cucinatti, Floreen A. Cucinatti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1218 (2) Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv11329
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
