Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00245
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Liviz Sr. v. Baker et al
as 1:2019cv10304
Defendant:
Governor Charlie Baker, Governor Phil Bryant, Governor Henry McMaster and others
Plaintiff:
Chief Jurist Ilya Liviz Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00677
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Gibeault v. Carrasco et al
as 4:2018cv40087
Plaintiff:
Scott J. Gibeault
Defendant:
Esteban Carrasco, Jr. , Ron San Angelo and Town of Southbridge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00140
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Komari v. Tufts University, et al
as 16-2124
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAVI KUMAR R. KOMARI
Defendant - Appellee:
DR. W. RON DEHAVEN, BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF MISSISSIPPI PUBLIC UNIVERSITIES, DR. JACK WALTHER, CPE Site Coordinator (2012) and others
Defendant:
AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, DR. LINDA ROSS, CPE Coordinator (2013) and TUFTS UNIVERSITY, OFFICE OF TRUSTEES
Komari v. Tufts University Office of Trustees et al
as 1:2015cv13941
Plaintiff:
Ravi Kumar Komari
Defendant:
Tufts University Office of Trustees , Linda Ross , W. Ron Dehaven and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CYR v. CITY OF BANGOR et al
as 1:2013cv00091
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL G CYR
Defendant:
CITY OF BANGOR , RON GASTIA , JOSEPH BAILLARGEON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv40014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv12144
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
