Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv12849
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Summers v. Jordan et al
as 4:2020cv40131
Defendant:
Anthony Marrama, Donna R. Pawlak, Mark Barbadoro and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey D. Summers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00463
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Marradi v. DWF IV Synergy 71-87 Summer, LLC
as 1:2016cv11644
Plaintiff:
Raoul Marradi
Defendant:
DWF IV Synergy 71-87 Summer, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1218
Hart v. Groff et al
as 1:2016fp00121
Defendant:
Timothy Arel, Arresting Officer, Eric Barbaro and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth H. Hart
Notice Only:
NH Attorney General - Notice Only - Civil (Court Use Only) and NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - Civil (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv13358
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1218
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv12066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DESENA et al v. STATE OF MAINE et al
as 1:2011cv00117
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM DESENA and SANDRA W DUNHAM
Defendant:
STATE OF MAINE , PAUL LEPAGE , KEVIN RAYE and others
Intervenor_defendant:
MAINE DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mellen v. President Chain Store Corp et al
as 1:2011cv10216
Plaintiff:
Jay Patrick Mellen
Defendant:
President Chain Store Corp, 7 Eleven Inc., 7 Eleven Manager Lowell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
