Cases 1 - 10 of 222
Victor v. The United States of America
as 1:2024cv11198
Plaintiff:
Danielle Victor
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Mandry-Mercado v. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico et al
as 3:2024cv01191
Plaintiff:
Javier E. Mandry-Mercado
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Victor Fingerhut-Mandry and Salvador Mandry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Pinero-Gago v. Torres-Rios et al
as 3:2023cv01577
Plaintiff:
Mr. Eulando Pinero-Gago
Defendant:
Mr. Alexis Torres-Rios, Mr Rafael Riviere-Vazquez, Mr. Marcos Concepcion-Tirado and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01451
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Rosado-Diaz v. THC San Juan LLC
as 3:2023cv01422
Plaintiff:
Victor M Rosado-Diaz
Defendant:
THC San Juan LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Rosado-Diaz v. THC San Juan LLC
as 3:2023cv01421
Plaintiff:
Victor M Rosado-Diaz
Defendant:
THC San Juan LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Nunez v. Transoceanic Cable Ship Co.
as 3:2023cv01325
Plaintiff:
Victor Rafael Nunez
Defendant:
Transoceanic Cable Ship Co.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Priester v. PR Department of Health, et al
as 22-1694
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SALLY PRIESTER
Defendant / Appellee:
PR DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, VICTOR RAMOS OTERO and COLEGIO DE MEDICOS-CIRUJANOS DE PUERTO RICO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
