Cases 161 - 170 of 16,158
Correa-Lopez v. Gonzalez-Ramos
as 3:2024cv01006
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Correa-Lopez
Defendant:
Edwin O. Gonzalez-Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Valencia Campaz v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2023cv00556
Petitioner:
Weimar Valencia Campaz
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Velez-Estupinan v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2023cv00558
Petitioner:
Juan Carlos Velez-Estupinan
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Piard v. Hakala et al
as 4:2023cv40180
Plaintiff:
Joseph Piard
Defendant:
Officer Hakala and Officer Bariamis
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy/Deprivation Civil Rights
Salsbury v. Gray
as 1:2024cv10050
Petitioner:
Arthur E. Salsbury and Arthur E. Salsbury, Jr.
Respondent:
Dean Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Iler-Reyes v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2023cv00553
Petitioner:
Jose Iler-Reyes
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Pineda-Martinez v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2023cv00555
Petitioner:
Frixon Eduardo Pineda-Martinez
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Benbow v. Officer Carnavale et al
as 1:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Aaron Benbow and Aaron C. Benbow
Defendant:
Officer Carnavale, Lt. Amaral, Deputy Warden Aul and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pinney v. Police of La Salle Illinois, et al
as 24-1035
Plaintiff:
JOHNATHAN PINNEY, a/k/a Gitapushy Val Angel
Defendant:
LASALLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, LASALLE COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY, LASALLE COUNTY COURT and others
Ridley v. Alves
as 1:2024cv10389
Petitioner:
Kelly Ridley
Respondent:
Nelson Alves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
