Cases 11 - 20 of 54
Romano v. Weeden, et al
as 22-1980
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SALVATORE R. ROMANO
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES WEEDEN, individually and officially, JOSEPH DINITTO, individually and officially, JACK WARD, individually and officially and others
Defendant:
C.O. DEPHILLIPS, individually and officially, C.O. GEOFF, individually and officially, ASHBEL T. WALL, individually and officially and others
Perry v. US
as 22-1751
Petitioner / Appellant:
KEVIN A. PERRY and KEVIN A. PERRY, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Interested Party:
CORNERSTONE BANK, EAGLE ACORN ACRES, LLC, BAY STATE SAVINGS BANK and others
Perry v. Boncher
as 4:2022cv40048
Petitioner:
Luke Perry
Respondent:
Amy Boncher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Perry v. FCI Berlin, Warden et al
as 1:2021fp00314
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and FCI Berlin, Warden
Plaintiff:
Kevin A. Perry, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2021cv00252
Petitioner:
Kevin A. Perry, Jr.
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sevegny v. Coyne-Fague et al
as 1:2019cv00498
Defendant:
Particia Coyne-Fague, Maurice Lanciaux, L.T. Perry and others
Plaintiff:
Bryan Sevegny
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Romano v. Wall et al
as 1:2019cv00370
Defendant:
C.O. Tomassi, C.O. Dephillips, Captain Lanoway and others
Plaintiff:
Salvatore R Romano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry v. USA DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE - ALL ENTRIES ARE TO BE MADE IN CRIMINAL CASE 17-cr-40010-TSH
as 4:2019cv40087
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Kevin A. Perry, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Harris v. Perry, et al
as 17-1091
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES E. HARRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
INVESTIGATOR D. PERRY, LT. MARCO, CPT. JAMES HOLLIS and others
Diaz v. Weeden et al
as 1:2017cv00009
Plaintiff:
Ulysses Diaz
Defendant:
James Weeden, Matthew Kettle, Michelle Auger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
