Cases 11 - 20 of 48
Sanchez v. Mici et al
as 1:2021cv10021
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe #4, John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Juan C. Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Butler v. Fuentes et al
as 1:2020cv00503
Defendant:
Officer John Doe #1, Officer John Doe #3, Officer S Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky Butler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aaron v. City of Lowell et al
as 1:2020cv11604
Defendant:
John Doe, Board of Inquiry Internal Investigation, City of Lowell and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Aaron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
TESHOME v. MAINE STATE PRISON et al
as 1:2020cv00150
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, 2, MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MAINE STATE PRISON and others
Plaintiff:
ABIL TESHOME
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Spaulding et al
as 1:2019cv11982
Plaintiff:
Derek Thomas
Defendant:
Scott Murray, Corey Pointer, Stephen Spaulding and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hickey v. Thompkins et al
as 1:2019cv11349
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Naphcare Medical Department, Jane Doe # 7 and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Hickey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vick v. United States Marshals Service et al
as 1:2019cv00267
Defendant:
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, United States Marshals Service, Donald W Wyatt Detention Facility and others
Plaintiff:
Charlie D. Vick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivera v. Hersey et al
as 1:2019cv10046
Defendant:
Karen D. Beausey, Deborah Scalfani, Ann Taylor and others
Plaintiff:
Oniel Rivera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jenkins v. Spaulding
as 1:2018cv12359
Plaintiff:
Sean Jenkins
Defendant:
John Doe 2, Spaulding and John Doe 1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Elwell et al v. Doe #1 et al
as 1:2018fp00906
Plaintiff:
Christopher M. Elwell
Defendant:
Strafford County Department of Corrections, Superintendent, John Doe #4, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
