Cases 21 - 30 of 60
Omran v. Laplante, et al
as 16-1876
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MOHAMMED ABDALLAH OMRAN
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH N. LAPLANTE, Federal Judge, US District Court, in both his individual and official capacities, MICHAEL J. GUNNISON, Assistant US Attorney, THOMAS V. TREVETHICK, Member of NH Attorney Discipline Office, in both his individual and official capacities and others
COPLEY v. VARTELAS
as 2:2016cv00343
Petitioner:
CRAIG O COPLEY
Respondent:
HELENE M VARTELAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sparks v. USA
as 1:2016cv11294
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Craig Sparks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Rich v. USA
as 1:2016cv00344
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Craig A. Rich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Carey v. USA
as 1:2016cv00288
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Craig A Carey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
CRAIG v. USA
as 1:2016cv00303
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
MARQUIS A CRAIG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Boston v. Suffolk County Sheriff Department et al
as 1:2016cv11018
Plaintiff:
Craig Boston
Defendant:
Suffolk County Sheriff Department, Alan Belvin and Steven Tompkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stile v. Somerset County, et al
as 16-1181
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES STILE
Defendant - Appellee:
HERRERA, Corrections Officer, PIKE, Corrections Officer, SOMERSET COUNTY and others
Stile v. Somerset County, et al
as 16-1180
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES STILE
Defendant - Appellee:
HERRERA, Corrections Officer, PIKE, Corrections Officer, SOMERSET COUNTY and others
Omran v. Gunnison, et al
as 16-1059
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MOHAMMED ABDALLAH OMRAN
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL J. GUNNISON, Assistant US Attorney, JOSEPH N. LAPLANTE, Federal Judge, US District Court, in both his individual and official capacities, THOMAS V. TREVETHICK, Member of NH Attorney Discipline Office, in both his individual and official capacities and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
