Cases 21 - 30 of 47
Raymond v. State of Rhode Island et al
as 1:2011cv00601
Plaintiff:
Earl Raymond
Defendant:
State of Rhode Island , Ashbel T. Wall, II , Peter Rossi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Widi v. US Department of Justice, et al
as 11-2293
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID WIDI
Defendant - Appellee:
US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, US ATTORNEY EXECUTIVE OFFICE, THOMAS EDWARD DELAHANTY, II, individually and in his official capacity as US Attorney for the District of Maine and others
:
ME ATTORNEY GENERAL
Wattleton v. Entzel
as 1:2011cv10552
Plaintiff:
David Earl Wattleton
Defendant:
Christopher Entzel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WATTLETON v. DOE et al
as 1:2010cv11969
Plaintiff:
David Earl Wattleton
Defendant:
John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dickerson v. USA
as 1:2010cv11853
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Earl Dickerson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Wattleton v. Kelly et al
as 4:2010cv40199
Plaintiff:
David Earl Wattleton
Defendant:
Kelly and Fort Devens Federal Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wattleton v. Kelly et al
as 4:2010cv40151
Plaintiff:
David Earl Wattleton
Defendant:
Lynn Kelly and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wattleton, et al v. Sebelius, et al
as 10-1866
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID EARL WATTLETON
Plaintiff:
KEDRICK F. O'MEARA, JOSEPH SANTULLI, MERVIN WATAHOMIGIE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary, Health and Human Services, US PROBATION and US BUREAU OF PRISONS
Wattleton v. Smith et al
as 4:2010cv40106
Plaintiff:
David Earl Wattleton
Defendant:
Brian Smith and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dessesavre v. Boston Police Department et al
as 1:2010cv10842
Plaintiff:
Earl Dessesavre
Defendant:
Boston Police Department, John Broderick, Jr. and Boston, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
