Cases 31 - 40 of 110
DOUCETTE et al v. AROOSTOOK COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2020cv00008
Defendant:
GRAIG CLOSSEY, AROOSTOOK COUNTY JAIL and DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff:
HARLEY D SIMON, COLBY DOUCETTE and HERBERT M ADAMS, IV
Not Classified By Court:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS v. MAGNUSSON et al
as 1:2019cv00547
Defendant:
RANDALL LIBERTY, MATTHEW MAGNUSSON, THOMAS AVERILL and others
Plaintiff:
JON R ADAMS
Not Classified By Court:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS v. AROOSTOOK COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2019cv00471
Defendant:
DR RONALD OLDFIELD, RN VANESA INVINITY, DR ROBERT LAMONI and others
Plaintiff:
HERBERT M ADAMS, IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall et al v. Capeless et al
as 3:2019cv30138
Defendant:
Rose Dawson, Erin Goffney, Joseph A Pieropan and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Hall and EME
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Romano v. Wall et al
as 1:2019cv00370
Defendant:
C.O. Tomassi, C.O. Dephillips, Captain Lanoway and others
Plaintiff:
Salvatore R Romano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neufville v. Barr et al
as 1:2019cv00348
Plaintiff:
Nyanati Jermaine Neufville
Defendant:
Jonathan Horton, M 4307 Nelligan, David D Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Neufville v. Barr et al
as 1:2019cv00292
Respondent:
Ronald D Vitiello, M 4307 Nelligan, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Petitioner:
Nyanati Jermaine Neufville
Interested Party:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ADAMS v. EASTERN MAINE HOSPITAL et al
as 1:2019cv00030
Defendant:
PENOBSCOT COUNTY JAIL and EASTERN MAINE HOSPITAL
Plaintiff:
JUSTAN ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS v. PENOBSCOT COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2018cv00446
Defendant:
PENOBSCOT COUNTY JAIL
Plaintiff:
JUSTAN ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schatten v. State of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2018cv12066
Respondent:
State of Massachusetts and Maura Healey
Petitioner:
Adam B. Schatten
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
